There has been a lot
of talk recently in Australia (with a federal election on the way) about the
meaning of a political mandate. When a party is elected into power, does that
mean it has a mandate, a right, to put into place all the policies which it
took with it into the election?
The answer is NO, and
the reasons are quite simple.
When I go to the
polling booth I have to make a choice between parties which have proposed a
whole raft of policies. Some of those policies I will agree with; some I will
not. This is true on both sides of politics. If I decide (for example) that
Party A’s economic agenda is, on balance, slightly better than that of Party
B’s, and I decide to vote for them on that basis, that does not mean that I support all their other policies. I might not
agree, for instance, with their policy on the environment or towards asylum
seekers. Just because I decide to vote for a party on the basis of one or a few
issues this does not mean that I do, or am obliged to, support all their
policies. Nor do I believe it gives them an automatic right to implement those
policies.
Democracy does not
begin at 8 am and end at 6 pm on polling day. Democracy requires that I and
every one of us continues to advocate for the things that are important to us. It
also demands that the government of the day be perpetually answerable to the
people, and not just on one day every three years or so.
Just because I voted
for YOU does not mean that I believe in everything you stand for; and I will
continue to speak loudly and irritatingly about those things I think you have
wrong.
Congrats on not slavishly following every plank of Party A's platform, as so many reflexively do. Where I live, people are trained to hate the other side to the extent that they never want to admit to any serious disagreements with their own.
ReplyDelete