It may surprise people
to learn what is important to me when reviewing a book—indeed, when deciding
whether or not to review a book. If a book is brought to my attention, the
first thing I do is go to the Amazon.com site and read a few pages of the
sample. I don’t pay any attention to the cover, and only scant attention to the
blurb, although the latter can provide clues about the genre and the context in
which the few pages I will read need to be understood. I don’t look at other
reviews, or even how many there are or what the average star rating is. Past
experience has demonstrated to me that these things have little meaning or
value.
So what will make me
decide, first of all, to purchase the book with the intention of reviewing? It
is, purely and simply, the quality of the writing. This is about more than just
spelling and grammar, although that is certainly important. If sentences are
clumsy or too wordy, if words are used inappropriately, if paragraphs are not
well formed and clearly defined, I am unlikely to bother. If the grammar is
correct yet there is no sign that the writer will use imaginative language; if
there are no interesting turns of phrase, I am unlikely to bother. If the
writer just writes down ‘what happens’ I am unlikely to bother. I don’t read a
novel for information. I read it, yes, for the story, but even more for the
flair with which it is told. I don’t expect genius, but the writing has to be
at least competent, and preferably a little more. I have usually made up my
mind after a page or two.
Of course, I am not in
a position to choose the book on the basis of plot or character development.
All I have to go on, when reading the sample, is the standard of the writing.
If it’s not up to standard—the standard I
expect, of course—I won’t be purchasing it, let alone reviewing it. That’s how
important the quality of the writing is to me.
So if I download a
book which has a reasonable standard of writing, it is already likely to get three
stars. This can fall away if the plot is full of holes, the characters poorly
developed, or there are atrocious anachronisms. It will rise if the story and
characters are interesting, and rise even further if some of the writing is
actually very good, and not just passable.
Perhaps this makes me
a snob, but I don’t think so. We might all go along to our children’s concert
at school, as they play violin in the orchestra. We will grimace behind our
smiles and complement and encourage the young performers. But we are unlikely
to buy an orchestral recording if the performers are playing the wrong notes or
their timing is astray, no matter how great the piece of music itself might be.
A great story poorly written is like a great symphony badly played.
The upshot of this is
that if writers want me to review their books, they won’t get past first base
if what I read in the sample preview is poorly written, no matter how good the
story might be.
Comment, take 2:
ReplyDeleteSo I just (well, recently now that I'm having to redo this) saw your twit about this article, so I decided that, since we've been random twitter follower/ees for awhile now (I actually have no idea how long its been). . . This comment is already mangled. I should start over. The first one was 'much' better. Hmn.
Well anyway, I've decided to see if I can take the Newey challenge and pass the test. Asking doesn't hurt too much, sometimes, eh? (I may have said that better this time. Pfft; maybe, maybe not.
Here goes. . . https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/214106
Hi Shannon. I have bookmarked your book (on Amazon, though). I haven't looked yet, so I won't say anything. I guess if you don't see a review (eventually) you'll have my answer! I do have a list of 'possibles' to work through. Cheers, Philip.
ReplyDelete