There was a television
show on a few nights ago, in which the British public had voted for the top 60
number one music hits of all time. I find these programs quite interesting. For
one thing, they reveal which songs are the real stayers. I am always a little
sceptical about the more recent hits that are inevitably voted amongst them.
Will they still be remembered in ten or twenty years time? Some of them
probably will; others almost certainly not. The previous night there had been
another show, tracing the history of the Rolling Stones, through their eyes (at
least to some extent). Both of these shows were in celebration of an
anniversary. The first, in celebration of the sixtieth anniversary of the
British pop charts. The second, in celebration of the Rolling Stones’ fiftieth
year together. It’s difficult to imagine!
British television
features a multitude of these kinds of shows, which, perhaps in a simplistic
fashion, explore the cultural history of the nation. I’m not sure if the United
States has the same fascination with its cultural history; or perhaps we just
don’t see that nation’s versions of these programs here.
There is naturally a
degree of nostalgia involved when watching these shows. Of course they evoke
memories of where we were and what we were doing at the time. We have the
opportunity to laugh at our outrageous (or boring) fashion sense at the time.
Remember when “big hair” was in vogue? But there is, at least potentially, a
slightly more serious side to this interest in popular cultural. The music, fashions
and popular culture of the time are not divorced from the politics and social
issues of the day; as indeed is still the case today. For instance, there are
very profound reasons why reality television has been so popular over the last
decade or so. I could speculate about those reasons, give my opinions. My
intention is not so much to do that, on this occasion, but simply to point out
that it is an important question to explore.
Returning to the top
hits program, there were some really moving moments for me. For example, can
anyone not be moved by the raw emotion of the video in which Sinead O’Connor
sings Nothing compares to you? And
then how could anyone not be delighted by the elfish, slightly crazy, but
delightful Kate Bush, singing Wuthering
Heights. These pieces, not just the songs themselves but the whole video
and performance, are really significant works of art. I would be happy to see
them “hanging” in an art gallery. The song by Procol Harem, A Whiter Shade of Pale, is not just a
cleverly crafted pop song, but, as one of the writers observed, “a duet between
organ and voice”, and as another person commented, “an impressionist painting
in words”. The central melody of that song is, of course, a reworking of a
piece by Bach. Using that piece in such a different context is itself a very
creative idea. I am sure that there are songs being written and performed,
videos being constructed, at this very moment, that will be every bit as
enduring as these earlier songs. As with many things, time will decide.
Some among you may
have no idea what I have been talking about in that last paragraph. Kate who? Procol what? That’s ok. Just know that in 30 or 40 years time, you will be
looking back and doing the same thing with the music that is big at the moment.
At least, I hope so.
No comments:
Post a Comment