I was just reading on a news website about the death of Margaret
Thatcher, at the age of 87. She was ever a woman to create divisions of
opinion; but whichever side of the divide you happen to fall on, it can hardly
be denied that she had an enormous impact on the last two decades of the
twentieth century (and beyond). Her influence has extended well beyond Britain,
with, even today, both sides of Australian politics continuing something of the
Thatcherite legacy.
What caused my jaw to drop, when reading the
article on the ABC (Australia) website, was the following:
the death of former
British prime minister Margaret Thatcher has been welcomed by her critics, who
say she damaged parts of the country;
and, further down the page, this:
About 200 Brixton
residents celebrated the news of her death by drinking and dancing to hip-hop
and reggae songs blaring from sound systems.
Now few people could find themselves more
ideologically opposed to Margaret Thatcher than myself, but this sentiment is
both sick and stupid. It would be different if she were a living dictator,
whose death led to the liberation of an oppressed people. I might still think
that such celebrations were misguided, but I could at least understand the
sense of relief and joy, the desire to celebrate a new freedom (potential
freedom, at least). But the woman hasn’t been in power for about 23 years! Get
over it, people!
I don’t know enough about the specifics of
Thatcher’s time of rule to be able to comment intelligently on any of her
specific measures. However, I have no doubt that, as much as people prefer to
see things in black and white (this spares them the need to think too much), her
legacy includes both good and bad elements. It’s far too simple (and
simplistic) to thoroughly demonise her.
No matter what harm Thatcher might have inflicted on some people by some of her policies, her death does not deserve to be celebrated in this way. There is no excuse for it. She was still a human being; she still has family and friends who no doubt cared for her deeply. This kind of celebration says much more about the sickness in the hearts of those who celebrate than it does about Margaret Thatcher.
*
All-read-E for all your manuscript assessment, copy editing and proofreading needs
You didn't live here and you don't know.
ReplyDeleteFor that you should be thankful.
Sections of British society are trying to deify her, using her remembrance as a way of whitewashing the damage that neoliberalism did and continues to do. That's what appears to have happened with Reagan. We will probably get schools and hospitals named after her, ironically. Even more ironically, she will have a publicly-funded funeral to the tune of 8 million pounds.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your general point, but the politicisation of one person's passing began with the PR-friendly media campaign to elevate her.